In the shadows of Stalin’s Soviet Union, behind the wire and frostbitten fences of the Gulag archipelago, a civil war unfolded in silence. It was not a war of nations or ideology but principle, identity, and power. Among the inmates of the sprawling Soviet prison camps, where murderers, thieves, political dissidents, and petty criminals were packed together in forced labor, the Suka Wars raged. These were not wars of slogans or manifestos. They fought with knives stolen from kitchens, sharpened spoons, fists hardened by cold, and vengeance born of betrayal. The name itself, suka, was a slur, a bitter insult roughly translating to the english word bitch that, in the world of Russian criminals, carried implications more damning than any sentence passed by the state.
The war began quietly, as many transformative events do, with a breach of custom in extraordinary times. During the Second World War, the Soviet government, facing dire manpower shortages and desperate to repel the Nazi invasion, offered thousands of prisoners their freedom in exchange for military service. Many accepted. They fought in penal battalions, on the front lines, with little more than a rifle and a promise that, if they survived, they might see their families again. Some returned with medals pinned to their chests, others with wounds that would never heal. But for all their bravery, these men had crossed a line that the thieves-in-law, or vory v zakone, considered sacred.
The vory had built a parallel moral universe inside the prisons, one that rejected the legitimacy of the Soviet state and the Tsarist one before it entirely. They lived by an unbreakable code. They were not to work for the state, not to serve in the military, cooperate with any authority, or even marry. They were outlaws in every sense, and they held this identity with pride. The suki, those who had gone to war, had, in the eyes of the vory, sold their souls for a bowl of soup and a soldier’s uniform. They had broken the code. When the suki returned to prison after the war, they were no longer welcomed as fellow inmates. They were marked for death.
At first, the violence was sporadic. A stabbing in a latrine. A throat slit in the night. But the camps were vast, and the number of suki returning from the front grew. These men had been hardened by war. Many had killed before. Some returned with leadership experience and military discipline. They organized, banded together for protection, and, in many cases, began cooperating with prison authorities. The administration, eager to suppress the vory and maintain order, saw an opportunity and often gave the suki more favorable positions, access to food, or even control over other prisoners. The suki, once considered traitors by their peers and the state, now found themselves in a position of growing power.
The vory, whose dominance had mainly been unchallenged for decades, responded brutally. They launched a purge. Entire barracks were drenched in blood. Knives made from scrap metal became currency. Some camps became killing grounds where suki and vory hunted each other like feral animals. The violence was apocalyptic in scale and almost invisible to the outside world. Gulag officials sometimes encouraged the fighting, seeing in it a convenient way to cull the inmate population and break the influence of the old criminal aristocracy. In other cases, they looked away and let the war play out.
Although the vory fought with the zeal of men defending a dying order, they could not match the suki's organization, brutality, and strategic adaptability. The suki were more numerous, often younger, and less bound by tradition. Many had military experience, understood discipline, and were not afraid to exploit alliances with prison officials or even engage in treacherous tactics the vory considered dishonorable. This made the suki a much different opponent from the intellectual and the political prisoner whom the vory were used to exploiting. Over time, their willingness to bend or break the old rules became their greatest strength. Camp after camp, they overwhelmed the vory, sometimes wiping them out entirely or forcing them into the shadows. By the early 1950s, it was increasingly clear that the suki were surviving and winning. In the informal history passed down among convicts, the Suka Wars ended with the old thieves in retreat and a new, more pragmatic criminal order in their place.
This conflict, though hidden from Soviet society, reshaped the underworld. It eroded the monolithic authority of the vory and introduced a new kind of pragmatism into Russian criminal culture. The code, once ironclad, had been tested by fire. The reality of life under Stalin, after he died in 1953, forced a reckoning. When millions of inmates were released during the post-Stalin thaw, many who walked free were suki. These were men who had not only survived the war and the front lines but also the brutal civil war in the camps. They had learned to negotiate, to manipulate, to kill without hesitation. They carried those lessons into the streets.
The postwar Soviet criminal world became something different from what it had been before. The idealized thief-in-law who rejected all state involvement was increasingly a relic. In his place rose a new figure, one willing to collaborate when necessary, one who could straddle the underworld and the upper echelons of state bureaucracy. Corruption began to replace purity. Money, not honor, became the dominant currency. The tattoos still mattered, each star, cathedral dome, or barbed wire told a story, but now even those symbols could be faked. Power was no longer just earned by adherence to the code. It could be bought, stolen, or negotiated.
By the time the Soviet Union collapsed, the foundations for the modern Russian mafia had already been laid in blood and betrayal decades earlier in the frozen camps of Siberia. The oligarchs, the gangsters in suits, the men who would smuggle weapons, oil, and influence across borders in the 1990s, emerged from this fractured lineage. They were the ideological descendants of the suki, shaped less by ideals and more by the cold calculus of survival.
The Suka Wars did not just end one culture and bring about another. They marked a more profound transformation when criminal identity was shattered and rebuilt under fire. Ultimately, they were at war not simply between men, but between two competing visions of what it meant to live outside the law. One revered honor and unbreakable loyalty. The other respected power and cunning. The latter proved far more durable in a country where even the state was lawless.
Add comment
Comments