Mike Waltz’s nomination to represent the United States at the United Nations comes at a moment when the global order is especially fragile. American leadership at the international level demands both sound judgment and diplomatic finesse. These are not qualities that define Waltz’s recent tenure in government. On the contrary, his record reveals a troubling pattern of recklessness and inexperience that calls into question his capacity to protect sensitive national interests and his fundamental fitness for a position that hinges on discretion, credibility, and the ability to navigate the world’s most complex diplomatic terrain.

Steve Hilton’s political evolution stands as a striking narrative of ideological contradiction. Once a firm advocate for progressive causes like environmental sustainability and social justice, his political transformation into a leading figure in conservative media marks a profound shift in both his views and the political landscape he inhabits. This shift, which has been years in the making, raises questions about Hilton's convictions and the broader ideological currents shaping modern politics.

In the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election, in which Harris launched a late-entry campaign and ultimately fell short, the once-dynamic vice president now stands at a “fateful crossroads,” as one report described it. Speculation is rife about Harris’s next move. The most prominent options are a return to California politics or another bid for the White House in 2028. Harris's decision will be paramount, shaping her political future and potentially influencing the broader political landscape.

With Governor Kim Reynolds’ decision to step down, the race to secure the Republican nomination for Iowa’s next governor has quickly become one of the most scrutinized political contests in the state. Reynolds’ tenure, marked by conservative education, healthcare, and labor reforms, has left a legacy that potential candidates must navigate carefully. As the field grows, each contender brings their unwavering vision for the future of Iowa, presenting voters with contrasting approaches to governance.

Just beyond the towering skyline of Manhattan, the neighborhoods of New York’s 17th Congressional District tell a story of suburban life and political transformation. Drive through the streets of Peekskill or the quiet lanes of Nyack, and the campaign signs offer more than mere endorsements. They are markers of a community in political flux, revealing shifting allegiances and the unresolved tensions that now define the American electorate. This is not a place where partisan loyalties are etched in stone. It is a political battleground shaped by contradiction, offering a preview of where the national conversation may be heading.

Joe Lombardo is precisely the kind of Republican the party needs in 2028, but few have recognized it. Perhaps he is overlooked because his age, 62, or not being the governor of the biggest state keeps his name out of the national conversation. However, in an era where many GOP contenders chase headlines and ideological purity, Lombardo stands out as a disciplined executive with a record of competence, a law enforcement veteran who commands respect without theatrics, and a battle-tested politician who has proven he can win in a competitive state. While he remains overlooked mainly in national political conversations, his blend of pragmatism and conservatism makes him an ideal vice-presidential contender who could help Republicans reclaim the White House.

In the polished boardrooms of Manhattan real estate, Steve Witkoff was once regarded as a master of the deal. A self-made billionaire, he rose from modest beginnings to amass a portfolio of luxury hotels, high-rise towers, and multimillion-dollar developments that transformed sections of New York’s skyline. For years, he was a fixture among the city’s elite, moving in circles where politics and business blurred easily, loyalty counted more than ideology, and proximity to power could elevate a property mogul into a political confidant.

Tom Tiffany does not want to answer to the people of Wisconsin. That much is clear from how he conducts himself in office and approaches his role as a public servant. It was evident this March in Wausau, where dozens of Wisconsinites gathered outside his office with a sincere and straightforward demand: to be heard. They stood in the cold with signs and voices, asking their congressman for something fundamental to democracy that should not be controversial or difficult. They wanted a town hall.

Kansas is not the state that usually captures national attention during a governor’s race. For generations, it has stood as a quiet and consistent pillar of Republican strength. In this state, conservative values are deeply rooted, and Democrats often struggle to gain even a foothold. But as the 2026 gubernatorial election approaches, Democrats have a reason to be optimistic. What was once assumed to be a reliably red race is now a toss-up, and the reasons behind that shift have everything to do with the political legacy of Governor Laura Kelly.

In 2024, Royce White made a shocking entrance onto the political stage when he secured the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. Despite his controversial past and deeply troubling views, White managed to build a following, tapping into the anger and frustration of voters disillusioned with the political establishment. Though ultimately unsuccessful in the general election, his candidacy should have served as a wake-up call. However, with Minnesota now projected to be one of the most fiercely contested battleground states in the upcoming 2026 election cycle, White's return to the political fray is not a distant nightmare but a real and imminent possibility. What’s more disturbing is that, given the state’s tight margins and the Republican Party’s eagerness to seize key Senate seats, White’s path to victory is far from improbable. His potential triumph, however, could tarnish the Republican Party's image, aligning it with dangerous rhetoric and divisive politics, and potentially alienating moderate voters.

Tim Walz is, by all accounts, a good man and a capable governor. He has led Minnesota with steady hands during turbulent times, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the George Floyd protests. His resume is commendable: a retired National Guard command sergeant major, a former high school teacher, and a two-term governor who won reelection handily. His unwavering dedication to public service, a reassuring testament to his commitment, is demonstrated throughout his career. He is grounded in Midwestern pragmatism, speaks the language of working families, and has shown a genuine commitment to public service throughout his career. None of this is in doubt. His ability to connect with rural America and his understanding of economic concerns in the heartland are strengths that cannot be overlooked. However, the question before the Democratic Party is whether Tim Walz is a good governor. Whether he can inspire and lead the country in a presidential election will likely be defined by extremism, disinformation, and the need for bold, resonant leadership. And by that metric, he falls short.

Mike Lawler, a seasoned politician with a track record of bipartisan cooperation, is considering a gubernatorial run in New York. His potential candidacy presents an interesting opportunity for a pragmatic, moderate Republican to break through in a state known for electing centrist politicians. Lawler has positioned himself as a moderate, focusing on practical issues like affordability, public safety, and quality of life, which resonate deeply with New Yorkers across the state. In a recent interview with WKBW TV in Buffalo, he highlighted themes, including the state’s high cost of living, the ongoing correctional officer strike, and energy and housing challenges. These are the kinds of issues that New Yorkers are grappling with daily, and Lawler’s emphasis on them could prove appealing to voters looking for a change.