As Peru gears up for its 2026 general election, the political atmosphere is charged with anticipation and uncertainty. This election comes at a crucial moment in the nation's history. The country has experienced years of political turmoil, marked by a revolving door of presidents and widespread public dissatisfaction with the political establishment. The election outcome will have a profound impact not only on the nation's governance but also on its broader social, economic, and international trajectory. With over 50 parties competing for power and over 12,000 candidates vying for various positions, the race is shaping to be one of the most competitive and consequential in Peru's modern history.
Four of the many candidates stand out as the key figures in the 2026 race, each representing a different vision for Peru’s future. The most well-known figure is Keiko Fujimori, the leader of the right-wing Popular Force party. Keiko, the eldest daughter of former president Alberto Fujimori, is no stranger to the political spotlight. Her father’s legacy continues to cast a long shadow over her career. As the incumbent president’s daughter, she carries the weight of his accomplishments and the controversies surrounding his time in office. Keiko first entered the political arena in 2006 when she was elected to Congress, and she has since become a prominent figure in the country’s right-wing politics. She has run for president in 2011, 2016, and 2021, each time finishing as the runner-up. While she has managed to maintain a loyal base, particularly among conservative voters who value her commitment to economic liberalization, law and order, and combating corruption, her candidacy is still highly controversial. Her father’s legacy, his positive achievements and authoritarian rule, continues to be a source of division in the country. Keiko has also faced significant legal challenges, including accusations of money laundering and campaign finance violations. As she campaigns for a fourth time, her leadership will undoubtedly be scrutinized as voters weigh her record, her legal troubles, and the legacy of the Fujimori family.
Rafael López Aliaga, the leader of the far-right Popular Renewal party, is another major contender in the 2026 race. A businessman by profession and former mayor of Lima, López Aliaga has built a reputation as an outsider who promises to restore traditional values and revitalize the country’s political system. His platform is staunchly conservative, focusing on reducing government spending, bolstering national security, and limiting immigration. He has also been vocal in his opposition to abortion, same-sex marriage, and sex education in schools. His rhetoric, which appeals to society's religious and conservative sectors, has made him a polarizing figure in Peruvian politics. While he is a right-wing darling, especially among voters who feel that the country’s political and social values have been eroded, López Aliaga’s controversial statements and divisive tone have made him a target for criticism. His populist style and sharp attacks on the political establishment resonate with many voters who see him as a man of the people. Still, his confrontational approach may alienate others who seek unity and stability.
On the other side of the political spectrum stands Verónika Mendoza, the leader of the left-wing New Peru movement. Mendoza, who hails from a background rooted in social justice activism, has built her political career on advocating for the rights of marginalized groups, particularly indigenous communities and women. Her political journey is rooted in her academic background in psychology and social sciences, which she studied in France. Mendoza has served in Congress and has positioned herself as a progressive alternative to the traditional political elite. Her platform focuses on constitutional reform, environmental protection, and policies to reduce social inequality. She is an outspoken advocate for progressive social policies, including gender equality, the rights of the LGBTQ+ community, and the protection of indigenous land. While her proposals have earned her significant support from the country’s more progressive voters, her left-wing stance has also made her a target for criticism from conservatives who accuse her of pushing the country too far to the left. Mendoza’s challenge lies in balancing her progressive ideals with the need to appeal to a broad swath of the electorate wary of radical change.
Finally, Hernando de Soto, an economist and former presidential candidate running under the centrist Progresemos party. De Soto is best known for his work in economic reform, particularly his focus on formalizing the informal economy. As a technocrat with decades of experience, de Soto advocates for policies to increase the country’s global competitiveness, modernize its infrastructure, and promote sustainable economic growth. His approach to solving Peru’s deep-seated issues of poverty and inequality centers on integrating informal businesses into the formal economy, thus increasing their access to credit, markets, and opportunities for growth. De Soto’s candidacy appeals to voters who prioritize economic modernization and are frustrated by the country’s slow progress in infrastructure development and economic diversification. His technocratic focus on market-based solutions positions him as a moderate alternative to the more ideologically driven candidates on both the right and left. However, de Soto’s close association with past administrations, particularly the Fujimori government, may hinder his ability to appeal to voters looking for a break from the country’s traditional political elite.
As the election approaches, Peru’s voters face a stark choice between these four major candidates, each offering a different vision for the future. For Keiko Fujimori, the election represents an opportunity to build upon her father’s legacy and restore the stability and economic growth many of her supporters associate with his rule. For Rafael López Aliaga, it is a chance to advance his conservative agenda and bring about what he sees as a much-needed cultural and political reset. Verónika Mendoza’s candidacy offers a progressive path forward, one focused on social justice, environmental sustainability, and a reimagined constitution that seeks to address deep-rooted inequalities. Hernando de Soto, meanwhile, provides a more pragmatic, market-oriented approach, centered on economic growth and modernization, with a particular emphasis on formalizing the informal economy.
This election is not just about choosing a leader but about choosing the direction in which Peru will head in the coming years. Will the country embrace a return to conservative values, or will it move towards a more progressive, socially just future? Will it continue toward economic liberalization or seek a more inclusive and sustainable development model? The answers to these questions will shape not only the political landscape of Peru but also its social fabric, economic future, and international relations. As voters prepare to cast their ballots, they must weigh the candidates’ promises, past records, and their vision for the future. In this election, the stakes could not be higher.
Add comment
Comments