In the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election, in which Harris launched a late-entry campaign and ultimately fell short, the once-dynamic vice president now stands at a “fateful crossroads,” as one report described it. Speculation is rife about Harris’s next move. The most prominent options are a return to California politics or another bid for the White House in 2028. Harris's decision will be paramount, shaping her political future and potentially influencing the broader political landscape.
At least one news account says she has given herself until late summer 2025 to decide whether to enter California’s 2026 governor’s race. Supporters note that, as governor of the nation’s most populous “blue state,” Harris would have “a powerful platform” to lead on key issues and to oppose the incoming Republican administration. Other insiders, however, caution that her path will be difficult. Some Democrats privately view Harris as a potential “figure of the past” and worry that a second female presidential run might falter in a country they perceive as still fraught with gender bias. In short, Harris’s decision will turn on a delicate calculus of risks and rewards in her bid to position herself for 2028.
National Polling and the 2028 Primary Outlook
Kamala Harris remains a highly polarizing figure in national polling. A September 2024 Gallup survey found just 44% of Americans rated her favorably against 54% who viewed her unfavorably, a balance of opinion well below 50%. In other words, a majority of the country still sees her in a negative light. Yet within the Democratic Party, early signs point to Harris maintaining a strong lead for the 2028 nomination. In one national survey conducted shortly after the 2024 election, 43% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents said they would vote for Harris if the 2028 primary were held “today,” far ahead of any other named candidate. Another poll (from Echelon Insights and Puck News) likewise put Harris atop the field at roughly 41% support among likely Democratic voters. These results suggest that most Democrats recall Harris’s recent campaign and remain inclined to back her, at least in hypothetical early balloting. (By contrast, two other top contenders, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, polled only in the single digits in these surveys.) Press accounts note that Harris “maintains significant leads in early national polls” for the Democratic presidential field. Yet these primary tests come with a caveat: they are very hypothetical and name-driven, and observers caution that many voters have yet to form opinions on all the prospective candidates.
The Appeal of Executive Experience
One clear argument favoring a Harris gubernatorial run is the value of executive experience. U.S. presidents have often come out of the governor’s mansion, from Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton to George W. Bush, and a successful tenure as California governor would broaden Harris’s résumé beyond her record as a senator, attorney general, and vice president. Advocates note that leading California (the world’s fifth-largest economy) would amplify her authority on issues that matter to Democrats, from climate policy to immigration. The New York Times reported that Harris believes that as governor, she “would have a powerful platform” to champion Democratic priorities and push back against the new Trump administration. A win would also make history: Harris would become the nation's first Black woman elected governor. Insiders say she is intrigued by that prospect, “the idea of being the chief executive of the fifth-largest economy in the world,” as one aide put it, and many California Democratic leaders stand ready to rally around her. In recent polling, state Democrats reacted warmly to the idea: roughly one-third of California Democratic voters said a Harris candidacy would make them “joyful” or “excited.” Moreover, aides note that Harris has built a vast fundraising network over two decades in politics; one assessment concluded she “would automatically be the front-runner” in a 2026 field thanks to her name recognition and “wide network of donors and supporters.” In short, if Harris sought the nomination from a governor’s office, she would begin with many of the formal advantages of an incumbent-like campaign: money, organization, and unified party backing.
Potential Drawbacks and Campaign Risks
Of course, the prospect of a California campaign carries significant pitfalls. California is a challenging governance environment, and critics say Harris has no proven track record of solving state issues. As one California observer put it, managing “the world’s fourth-largest economy” is “daunting” and not a mere consolation prize. Analyses point out that Harris’s record in elected office has been sparse: she “did little of note” as state attorney general, U.S. senator, or vice president, according to one writer. A lead (or a win) in a California primary would not insulate her from attack. Veteran strategist Mike Murphy, who advises rival candidates, warned that Harris may have a “glass jaw”: she starts ahead, he argued, but is highly vulnerable to a sharp, sustained campaign. Another Democratic insider expressed a similar concern, saying Harris’s early poll strength is essentially “a reflection of her name ID and the fact that she just spent $1.4 billion on a losing presidential campaign”. In other words, her advantage comes from familiarity, not necessarily genuine enthusiasm. Indeed, more than 40% of California influencers polled were indifferent or even hostile about the idea of Harris’s run. And in aggregate polls of potential opponents, other Democrats have already signaled readiness to attack Harris’s weak spots; one noted that voters “want a leader willing to take on the tough challenges” of housing and homelessness, implicitly warning that Harris must earn their trust.
Harris would also risk burning political capital if she ran and lost again. Having now been on the ticket twice and lost, a statewide loss (even against Republican odds) could cement a narrative of unelectability. Winning is not without problems, too, as one report suggests a potential gubernatorial victory would “almost certainly take a 2028 presidential run off the table” for her. Simply put, going for the governor’s office is a full commitment that would likely end her immediate White House prospects. Republicans and rivals would surely exploit a campaign fraught with missteps, from policy stumbles on California’s chronic challenges to any personal mischaracterizations. For example, polls hint at holes in her coalition: a recent survey found more than one in five Latino voters felt hopeless at the prospect of her candidacy, and over a quarter of independents said they felt irritated. In the general election, those demographics often decide California’s outcome, which suggests Harris cannot assume automatic support outside her core base. Even among Democrats, skeptics privately wonder if nominating “another woman” now would face headwinds or if Harris might be judged too tied to the old guard. In sum, a California campaign could expose Harris to fresh criticisms and give opponents new fodder in a broader presidential cycle at the wrong moment.
Running a Gubernatorial Campaign: Visibility and Coalition Effects
How would a 2026 California campaign affect Harris’s national profile? There are arguments on both sides. On one hand, a high-profile governor’s race could keep Harris in the headlines and offer a showcase for her leadership ambitions. She could tailor her messaging to national themes, for instance, framing California’s policy battles as part of the larger struggle against Trumpism and use the campaign to solidify key alliances (especially among West Coast and Hispanic leaders) that she might court in 2028. Politico notes that even as Harris weighs the governor’s race, she has sought to “keep her name in the national conversation,” appearing recently at an NAACP awards ceremony and speaking at an artificial intelligence conference in Nevada (an early 2028 primary state). These moves suggest she and her team view the governor’s campaign as one stage in a larger national strategy, not a retreat from it.
On the other hand, focusing on California might shift her persona from a national figure to a regional one. Voters outside the state, including many Democratic power brokers in the Midwest and Northeast, may pay little attention to her gubernatorial run, potentially allowing other 2028 contenders to gain momentum. Some traditional supporters may chafe at her absence from national policy debates during a long gubernatorial campaign. Further, the survey data imply Harris must rebuild specific coalitions while running statewide. For example, Asian-American voters in California were lukewarm in the poll; 18% of Asian Democrats said Harris’s potential run makes them feel irritated, suggesting the need for outreach. Because California uses a “top-two” primary system, a gubernatorial contest also offers a rare chance to win over moderate Republicans and independents in the primary; Democrats in other states will no doubt watch how Harris (as a Democrat) appeals to cross-party voters in June 2026. It is worth noting that a highly energized governorship campaign could raise Harris’s fundraising profile further. Still, it could just as easily frustrate some donors if she seems locked into state politics instead of national party leadership. In short, a California bid would reshape Harris’s coalition, potentially strengthening her standing with some local constituents, but perhaps at the expense of broader national ties.
California’s Political Landscape and the 2026 Field
California remains a profoundly Democratic state, with Democrats outnumbering Republicans by roughly 20 percent in voter registration, so any Democratic nominee starts with a significant structural advantage in the general election. Still, the 2026 contest is unusually open (Gavin Newsom is term-limited), and the field of potential candidates is crowded. Without Harris, big names include Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, ex-Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, and former state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Several contenders have clarified that they would step aside if Harris enters the race; for example, Kounalakis and Porter have signaled they would defer to her candidacy. The state attorney general, Rob Bonta, said he wouldn’t run partly because Harris “would be a ‘field-clearing’ candidate, " effectively ending the Democratic primary before it began. By contrast, Villaraigosa has vowed to press on regardless of Harris’s decision. When Becerra announced his campaign, he declared he was “in it to stay” no matter what. In other words, Harris’s entry would shake up the Democratic lineup dramatically.
On the Republican side, the leading candidates appear to be conservative activists rather than traditional statewide officeholders. Two Republicans have recently grabbed headlines: ex-Fox News host Steve Hilton (an ardent critic of Newsom) and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco (known for defying COVID mandates). Both are outsiders ready to end decades of one-party rule in Sacramento. Yet any Republican faces a steep climb in deep-blue California; the last GOP to win statewide was Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006. Even Republican strategists acknowledge the uphill battle, although they believe their victory is essential for the state, as one GOP candidate summed it up by calling California “the sick man of America” and vowing “radical” changes. In a stark rebuttal to the Republicans, California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks responded bluntly that voters expect a Democratic governor who can defend the state against the Trump administration.
California’s unusual “top-two” primary system adds another twist. If Harris runs and lands one of the top two spots in June 2026, the general election (November) could be either two Democrats or a Democrat vs. a Republican. Political analysts note that in a crowded Democratic field, one moderate Republican might grab the second spot, setting up a nominally bipartisan runoff. In the 2024 U.S. Senate primary, Democrats split their vote so evenly that a little-known Republican finished second, a pattern that could repeat. On the other hand, if two Democrats advance (which many expect given California’s partisan tilt), Harris would enter November as the prohibitive favorite. Although, it is worth noting that a running against a progressive democrat in the run off might serve to deflate her appeal to progressives come 2028. Dan Walters of CalMatters observes that California voters have recently shown themselves “restive” on housing costs, homelessness, and crime. Any Democratic candidate who taps into that frustration and appeals broadly to independents and moderate Republicans could make the race competitive, even if the general election still leans Democratic. Several analysts caution that Harris (or any Democrat) would still have to earn every vote. As former Senate leader Toni Atkins said after seeing early poll results, “Governors are elected, not anointed,” she insisted that she has been campaigning from the grassroots to meet that challenge.
Conclusion: A Calculus of Pros and Cons
Kamala Harris’s choice of whether to run for California governor in 2026 is a complex strategic calculation. On the one hand, she stands to gain valuable executive experience, reinforce her leadership credentials, and campaign on a powerful national stage that could be extended through the governor’s office. On the other, she would be taking a high-wire political risk in a bruising statewide contest that could expose vulnerabilities and potentially sideline her 2028 ambitions if it goes poorly. The available polling provides clues but no certainty: Democrats nationally still like her enough to consider her their front-runner, yet California’s voters and even party insiders express enthusiasm and caution. If Harris’s strengths, name recognition, fundraising prowess, and a unified Democratic base in California carry her to victory, she will emerge with a sterling new résumé for a presidential run. But if her weaknesses, thin record as an executive, lukewarm support among some key constituencies, and the weight of recent losses are exploited on the campaign trail, the gamble could backfire. The reality is Harris would need to win an overwhelming majority or questions of her electability will be raised. In the end, Harris and her advisers must weigh all these factors. The pathway to the White House in 2028 may be more straightforward with a successful tenure as California governor. Still, it could just as easily be blocked by a tough primary and general election battle two years earlier. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on whether the upside of governing outweighs the downside of another brutal campaign.
Add comment
Comments