Amid the high-stakes 2025 Democratic primary for New York City mayor, a narrative has quietly emerged around Queens native Adrienne Adams as the one candidate who truly marries experience with vision. Unlike the familiar former governor Andrew Cuomo or the insurgent progressive Zohran Mamdani, Adams is running on a steady record of public service. In announcing her campaign, Adams declared: “New Yorkers can’t afford to live here, City Hall is in chaos… Our city deserves a leader that serves its people first… I’m a public servant, mother, and Queens girl, and I’m running for Mayor. No drama, no-nonsense, just my commitment to leading with competence and integrity.” That motto captures her approach: she promises to govern with practical problem-solving and ethics, not ego. Her campaign focuses on housing, education, and public safety, three crucial areas for the city's future. Even as Cuomo and Mamdani make headlines, many voters and analysts recognize that Adams has quietly built a resume of governing accomplishments that puts her among the most qualified contenders.
Adams’s ascent in city politics has been nothing short of historic. Elected to the City Council in 2017, she made history as District 28’s first female council member, representing Southeast Queens neighborhoods like Jamaica and South Ozone Park. In January 2022, her colleagues elected her as Council Speaker. This groundbreaking move made her the first Black person to hold that role. It led the most diverse, first women-majority Council in city history. Her official Council biography proudly proclaims, “Adrienne Adams is the Speaker of the New York City Council… she leads the most diverse and the first women-majority Council in New York City history as the first-ever African American Speaker.” In Council, she championed her community: fighting for fair budgets, more local schools and parks, and for better sanitation and infrastructure in historically underfunded neighborhoods. During the peak of the pandemic, for instance, Adams worked to bring more testing and vaccine sites into her district, which had seen some of the highest COVID-19 case rates in the city. Her Queens upbringing and union family roots (the daughter of two union workers) inform her blue-collar pragmatism. Re-elected as Speaker, she continued to drive major initiatives, from ending wasteful tax-lien auctions to funding education equity, that underscore her hands-on leadership. In short, she’s governed on a level that none of her rivals can claim.
During her tenure as Speaker, Adams has overseen and sponsored legislation on a range of issues, consistently focusing on equity and opportunity. Her commitment to women’s health and reproductive justice led the Council to historic action. Within weeks of the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, Adams helped shepherd the NYC Abortion Rights Act into law, a package to “safeguard and expand abortion and reproductive health care” across the city. She assembled the first women-majority Council to address long-standing maternal health disparities and to ensure abortion services remain accessible to anyone who needs them. Her Council even created what experts hailed as the most significant municipal funding in the nation to cover abortion care for those who cannot pay directly. At the same time, Adams has shown fierce concern for victims of violence: she secured a new $5.1 million program to fund neighborhood-based community safety and victim services. She helped establish New York’s first network of trauma recovery centers. These are not abstract proposals but concrete budgets and laws that provide real help to survivors. In education, she has likewise pressed for reform and support: she championed an initiative to bring Black Studies curricula into every public school and launched CUNY Reconnect, a program letting working-age New Yorkers return to college, one that has already helped “more than 16,000 students,” restart their education. Adams’s legislative tenure makes clear she can translate values into action on everything from health care to learning.
Housing, affordability, and public safety are among New Yorkers’ top concerns, areas where Adams also has a clear record. On housing, she has been blunt that “our city faces a dire housing crisis.” Under Adams’s leadership, the Council approved more than 40 development projects in 2022, creating over 12,000 new homes (about 63 percent of them affordable) for the first time in generations. She then unveiled a comprehensive Fair Housing Framework, a citywide plan to set production goals in every neighborhood and push deeper affordability. The plan would adjust zoning rules, require city-state financing packages for public housing, and even expand homeownership tools like community land trusts. All of these steps address significant trends. As she noted from her council podium, New York’s Black population has shrunk by nearly 10 percent over two decades as skyrocketing rents “drive people out of their homes.” Adams has vowed to confront those dynamics head-on, not with slogans but with policy.
On public safety, Adams again brings hands-on experience. As chair of the Council’s Public Safety Committee earlier in her career, she helped pass landmark police reforms, for example, ending qualified immunity for officers and mandating detailed NYPD reporting on vehicle stops by race, gender, and age. Her reforms empowered the Civilian Complaint Review Board to launch misconduct probes, increasing accountability in policing independently. At the same time, Adams knows that safe streets come from social investment, not just more patrols: she argued that “the safest communities are the ones with the most resources, not the most incarceration.” She Directed city funds to expand youth diversion, supportive housing and behavioral health services. Her State of the City address also included practical ideas like expanding half-priced transit (Fair Fares) to families earning up to 200 percent of the poverty level, a move projected to help working-class New Yorkers access jobs and help the MTA’s finances. In short, Adams’ approach to safety is to strengthen communities and opportunity, not scare tactics or blunt force, a point she made pointedly in a recent debate when she challenged her opponent Cuomo’s crime rhetoric: “old slogans and scare tactics aren’t going to make anybody in New York City safer,” she snapped.
These records on core issues, housing, education, safety, labor, and economic mobility, help illustrate what Adams stands for. Now consider her two leading competitors. Andrew Cuomo, once a formidable figure, remains an electoral force, but his candidacy carries heavy baggage. Four years ago, he left the governor’s office amid damning scandals, an Attorney General report found that Cuomo had sexually harassed 11 women, and he resigned after the investigation’s findings became public. In debates, he has tried to minimize or dodge these episodes. Yet voters and rivals still raise them. Onstage in June, one former colleague flatly told him: “Everyone here knows you sexually harassed women… [those] allegations are not in dispute.” Cuomo’s campaign leans on his name recognition and history as a government operator, but polls reveal cracks. As one political analyst notes, Cuomo’s lead has shrunk dramatically: early broad leads have given way to narrow margins, leaving open the possibility that his comeback bid could be “bloodied” by rivals. The consensus is that his support is mostly by default: many older Democrats recall his pandemic-era briefings or want to stop Mamdani. Even so, he depends heavily on big-money donors and last-minute endorsements. In recent days, he’s won support from unlikely allies, former rivals and union bosses, and community leaders who once pressured him to resign, suggesting his campaign will rely on old networks rather than new ideas. His policy pitch is to “bring his aggressive leadership” style to City Hall to tackle crime, but even that resonates unevenly. He continues to mischaracterize NYC’s safety and Adams’ counterattack hints at his weakness: Cuomo has warned that the city is such dangerous people “are afraid to leave their houses at night,” and Adams retorted dryly, “I don’t know how long you’ve been out of it, Mr. Cuomo, but it’s been a while.” More serious, of course, are his ethics issues: in the same debate Adams pointedly reminded him that “he is not fit to be mayor” given his track record.
On the other side is Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old New York Assemblymember and self-described democratic socialist. He has energized a segment of the electorate with ambitious progressive plans: his platform includes freezing rents for regulated apartments and raising taxes on the very wealthy to pay for new social services such as free bus transit and government-run grocery stores. Even Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has praised his ground game, saying he has assembled “a coalition of working-class New Yorkers,” ready to lead. And he’s quickly capitalizing on dissatisfaction with establishment politicians. But Mamdani’s candidacy also raises questions about readiness. Opponents pounced on his young age and slim resume, arguing that the mayoralty means running a $100+ billion budget and managing 330,000 city workers. This line was made by Cuomo himself in the debate: “Experience matters, and I think inexperience is dangerous… You’re now going to run a staff of 300,000 employees.” Even Speaker Adams skewered him directly when he boasted of being the most qualified: she asked him, after listing her accomplishments, if he thought he was more skilled than she waspolitico.com. In interviews, Mamdani often cites idealistic vision over specifics. He’s been criticized for having a “paltry record” in Albany and far-left positions (especially on Israel) that many city voters find troubling. His proposals also face hurdles: many of his revenue ideas would require state approval, and Gov. Hochul has already signaled she would veto tax increases on the rich. In sum, Mamdani’s candidacy brings energy and bold ideas, but also risk, and it is precisely this contrast, age and ideology versus Adams’s combination of earned experience and steady practicality, that makes Adams stand out.
Adams’s campaign has seized on those contrasts. She prides herself on rising above partisan labels: “I’ve been labeled as a moderate in people’s attempt to make sense of who I am,” she said, “but my focus has always been public service, which has no political label.” In practice she has been a force for progressive change, but always wrapped in measured pragmatism. Her record shows it: experts and community leaders praise her initiatives, from expanding minority business support to bolstering transit equity. For example, the Center for an Urban Future highlighted Adams’s plan to support entrepreneurs in public housing, noting that her proposals “will ensure that a lot more NYCHA residents can benefit from the city’s small business assistance services.” Leaders of minority-owned business groups have applauded her efforts to improve access to capital for minority- and women-owned firms, pointing to the Council’s work in enacting new MWBE programs. And labor unions have taken notice: in a significant break from tradition, District Council 37, the city’s largest municipal union representing 150,000 public-sector workers, most of them Black and Latino, chose to endorse Adrienne Adams as its top pick in the primary. DC37’s statement was telling: “At a time when workers’ rights are being ripped apart at the federal level, it’s more important than ever to elect local candidates who will fight for working families,” union director Henry Garrido said. In other words, rank-and-file city workers see Adams as a genuine champion of labor. (Notably, DC37’s backing signals that black, union households in neighborhoods like hers are giving Adams a substantial boost where she matters most). All of this underscores that Adams does not fit into any tired category: she is the kind of leader who built consensus in the Legislature and now wants to bring that coalition-building to City Hall.
Even beyond endorsements, the arithmetic of ranked-choice voting favors a candidate like Adams. With no clear majority favorite and multiple credible candidates, voters need a smart strategy. Many progressives and moderate Democrats already view Adams as the second choice to unite against Cuomo’s frontrunning bid. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has made Zohern Mamdani her #1 pick, explicitly told her supporters she would rank Adrienne Adams second on her ballot. (In the same breath, Ocasio-Cortez noted that Assemblymember Yvette Clarke made Adams her #1 choice). This bipartisan-sounding slate of endorsements suggests that Adams is the consensus pick if Andrew Cuomo is off the ticket. Strategists note that in a final count of roughly 900,000 likely Democratic primary voters, even a slight shift in second-choice preferences could tip the scales. Adams herself spelled out the goal: “The objective is to beat Andrew Cuomo… He is not fit to be mayor,” she told reporters after a debate. That clarity, combined with her clean reputation and broad appeal, means that any voter who puts Cuomo last should consider Adams as the next-best option, as she has the organizational strength and endorsements to serve as an alternative.
Moreover, national issues make Adams’s case even stronger for many New Yorkers. The city is feeling the pinch of federal tensions on immigration: under the Trump administration’s return to power, NYC’s sanctuary status is under threat, and federal funding cuts loom. Adams has stood out as a clear defender of New York’s immigrant communities. Long before she ran for Mayor, as Council Speaker, she led her colleagues to ready a lawsuit against city and federal authorities to block threats to the city’s sanctuary laws. At a recent rally, Adams warned that the current Mayor was “selling out New Yorkers” by collaborating with Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda.
She made the case that “sanctuary laws don’t just reflect our values; they make our entire city safer and stronger,” empowering immigrants to report crimes and start businesses without fear of deportation. Her advocacy has even extended into state-level reform; Adams has helped pass laws (like her “NYC Abortion Rights Act”) that insulate city services from hostile state and federal policies. In an era where reproductive rights, pandemic recovery, and economic opportunity are national flashpoints, Adams’s record shows she can localize those fights to help New Yorkers. At the same time, Cuomo and Mamdani grapple with their national brand baggage. (For instance, Cuomo has so far been notably silent on the Republican-backed federal move to restrict abortion, whereas Adams codified abortion protections into city law).
In the final analysis, Adrienne Adams’s case to voters is that she can both inspire and govern. She has delivered on issues that matter, including affordable housing, public school equity, fair transit, and climate resilience in city planning, and done so with bipartisan respect from unions, community groups, and her colleagues. At the same time, she speaks plainly about how national currents shape local life, defending immigrants and women’s rights, standing up to threats of defunding, and helping working families weather inflation and the recovery. Voters frustrated by the old political drama will note that Adams offers no more showbiz. Her record of achievement and praise from experts (for example, higher-education advocates credit her CUNY Reconnect plan with jump-starting thousands of stalled degrees) indicate that she understands how to use City Hall’s tools.
Ultimately, in a wide-open race, Adams’s appeal lies in being the candidate who bridges the gaps. She is more progressive than Cuomo and more seasoned than Mamdani, embodying “experience and vision” in one package. Her campaign slogan might as well be “bridge builder,” seeking to unite skeptical progressives and concerned moderates. The strategic reality of ranked-choice voting amplifies this: by ranking Adams high, voters who want to stop Cuomo and distrust Mamdani’s inexperience can consolidate behind her. It’s no coincidence that both AOC and a major labor union are signaling Adams as the viable alternative. When votes are tallied in June, those who prioritize principle and competence and seek a consensus leader who can enact reforms will find that Adrienne Adams stands out as the sensible, prepared, and progressive choice. In these turbulent times, New York City deserves “no drama, no-nonsense” leadership, and Adams’s record shows she delivers precisely that.
Add comment
Comments