In the final days before Poland’s national election this Sunday, a carefully staged visit to the White House sent shockwaves through Polish and international political circles. The unexpected arrival of Karol Nawrocki, a candidate whose campaign teeters on the edge of collapse amid scandal and mounting opposition, not simply to shake hands but to claim a lifeline from one of the most divisive figures on the world stage: former U.S. President Donald Trump, was a moment that piqued curiosity and sparked intense interest. What might have been dismissed as a routine diplomatic gesture quickly revealed itself as a bold and calculated intervention, one loaded with symbolism and stakes far beyond the borders of Poland. This was not just about one man’s bid for power; it was a moment that crystallized the volatile intersection of nationalism, global influence, and the fragile state of democratic norms in an age where the world’s most controversial former leader still wields an outsized influence beyond his own country.
In another era, such a gesture might have been quietly discouraged by the American political establishment, which once held to the belief that a former head of state should exercise discretion and avoid appearances of interference in the democratic processes of allied nations. However, Trump has never subscribed to the older customs of diplomacy or the traditional architecture of international relations. From the beginning of his political ascent, he has wielded personal loyalty as a political instrument, elevating those who echo his rhetoric and punishing those who depart from it. In Karol Nawrocki, Trump sees more than a candidate from a foreign land. He sees a kindred spirit, a man who speaks the language of national grievance and historical resentment, a man who has used the levers of institutional memory to shape public consciousness, and a man who, despite the scandals that now surround him, remains tethered to a party Trump admires and a cause Trump believes in. The unexpectedness of Trump's support for Nawrocki adds a layer of surprise and intrigue to the unfolding political drama.
The Law and Justice party, which propelled Nawrocki into political relevance, is no stranger to criticism from Western democracies. It has hollowed out judicial independence, waged a sustained campaign against press freedom, and passed laws that systematically marginalize migrants, women, and LGBTQ citizens. It has positioned itself as a guardian of traditional Polish values in opposition to the liberalizing currents of the European Union. These are not incidental traits. They are the foundation of its political strategy. For years, Law and Justice has aligned itself with the kind of muscular nationalism that has flourished after Trump’s rise to power in 2016, which continues to reshape political landscapes from Budapest to Rome. The party’s appeal lies in its rejection of compromise, its readiness to provoke cultural confrontation, and its belief that historical mythology can be weaponized for political gain. That Nawrocki, a historian who once curated Poland’s national memory for state purposes, would emerge as its candidate was no surprise. What surprised some was the degree to which he would lean into that legacy even as his campaign faltered.
In recent weeks, Nawrocki’s prospects have dimmed. He has struggled to shake off reports of financial improprieties, controversial real estate transactions, and past affiliations with far-right groups. What began as a coronation campaign has become a damage control operation. His challenger, Rafał Trzaskowski, the centrist mayor of Warsaw, has surged in the polls by offering a transparent and credible alternative. Trzaskowski promises to restore democratic checks and balances, rebuild Poland’s fractured relationship with Brussels, and shift the country away from the inward-looking nationalism that has dominated its politics for nearly a decade. For young Poles, urban professionals, and many in the country’s growing civil society sector, he represents political change and a generational reset.
In this climate, with only days remaining before Poles head to the ballot box, Nawrocki appeared at the White House. There were no extended policy discussions, no bilateral summits, and no official capacity that justified the visit. There was only the image: Nawrocki standing beside Donald Trump, smiling for the cameras, the American flag billowing in the background. For Trump, it was a reaffirmation of his enduring power to shape political narratives even beyond the borders of his own country. For Nawrocki, it was a calculated risk, a last-minute gamble that the weight of Trump’s brand might rescue his candidacy from collapse.
The irony of the moment was almost unbearable. Trump, who once expressed outrage when foreign leaders offered even the mildest support to his political opponents, now stood as an uninvited arbiter of a European election. During his 2020 campaign, Trump denounced Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for suggesting that American leadership should return to normalcy. He treated such comments as acts of subversion, warning against foreign interference and cloaking himself in the language of sovereignty. After his loss that year, he built an entire mythology of betrayal that included vague allegations of international conspiracy and foreign collusion. The specter of meddling became a permanent fixture in his narrative of victimhood. And yet now, just five years later, Trump has placed himself at the center of another country’s democratic process, unapologetically leveraging his influence to tip the scales.
This decision was not only hypocritical. It was strategic. Trump knows the value of symbolic politics, particularly in countries where national identity remains a site of struggle and contestation. His support for Nawrocki is not merely an act of ideological solidarity. It is an assertion of leadership over a transnational movement that continues to evolve in his image. Trumpism is no longer an American phenomenon. It has become a global brand that celebrates defiance against liberal institutions, stokes anxiety about demographic change, and cultivates a sense of cultural siege. In Poland, where memories of occupation, war, and betrayal run deep, that message resonates with particular force. It is not difficult to draw a straight line from Trump’s populist messaging to the narratives that animate Nawrocki’s campaign. The calculated nature of Trump's actions is evident, adding a layer of understanding to his political strategy.
However, Trump’s endorsement is also rooted in geopolitical calculations. Over the past several years, Poland has become a crucial node in the American military network that supports Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression. Under Law and Justice, the country has dramatically increased its defense budget, procured billions of dollars’ worth of American military equipment, and opened its territory to a significant and growing U.S. troop presence. These moves have made Poland a frontline ally in NATO’s eastern flank, which Washington depends upon even as political tensions simmer beneath the surface, for Trump, who has repeatedly questioned the utility of NATO and floated the idea of disengagement, Poland under PiS offers a rare alignment. It is nationalist, militarized, and deeply suspicious of Russia. Supporting Nawrocki is not just about ideology. It is about ensuring that the security architecture he prefers, a loose confederation of bilateral loyalties rather than multilateral alliances, remains viable.
The reaction to the meeting was swift and deeply divided. Critics in both countries condemned it as a cynical intrusion into a democratic process that should belong solely to Polish voters. Trzaskowski’s campaign, though cautious in its public language, privately expressed concern that the visit would grant Nawrocki a new aura of legitimacy in the final stretch of the race. European leaders, already anxious about Trump’s reemergence on the global stage, interpreted the event as a troubling sign that the norms of democratic noninterference were once again being cast aside. The symbolism was not lost on anyone. In one of the most consequential elections in the European Union this year, the ghost of Trumpism had appeared not in whispers or insinuations but in full daylight, bearing a smile and a handshake.
Whether that gesture will prove decisive remains to be seen. Like their European counterparts, Polish voters are increasingly wary of performative politics. Many have grown tired of the culture wars, the institutional decay, and the economic stagnation that have accompanied the PiS era. Younger generations in particular are looking for something more stable and future-oriented. For them, the spectacle in Washington may feel like one more reminder of what they are trying to leave behind. However, the endorsement could carry real weight for others, particularly in the rural east and among older voters who still believe in the party’s message of national revival. Trump remains popular in segments of Polish society that view him as a symbol of strength and defiance, and Nawrocki’s campaign is betting that those impressions will survive the controversies.
As Poland prepares to vote this Sunday, the meeting in Washington looms large not as a final word but as a provocation, a challenge to the idea that democratic elections must be shielded from outside influence. Trump’s decision to welcome Nawrocki is not just a footnote in the campaign. It is a reminder that the old rules no longer apply in the new political order, where ideology flows more freely than borders and power is asserted as spectacle. The world that Trump is trying to build, one handshake at a time, is not one of sovereign democracies acting independently, but of ideologically aligned governments taking shape under the shadow of a global movement. Every election becomes a battlefield in the broader war over identity, authority, and truth. And for Trump, victory anywhere is a victory everywhere.
Add comment
Comments