A handshake at the White House on August 8, 2025, marked what U.S. President Donald Trump hailed as a "historic peace treaty" between Armenia and Azerbaijan, intended to end decades of bitter conflict and usher in a new era of stability in the volatile South Caucasus. Presiding over the signing between Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Trump celebrated the moment as a "miracle," announcing the establishment of the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity," or TRIPP corridor. This diplomatic fanfare, however, was swiftly met with a thunderous declaration from Iran, a critical regional player, vowing to "block the plan" and branding it "unacceptable". The immediate, almost simultaneous, expressions of triumph from Washington and outright defiance from Tehran underscore a fundamental truth: this "peace deal" is not a universally accepted resolution but rather a significant geopolitical maneuver. The very act of brokering peace, in this instance, has immediately created new lines of conflict, revealing that the primary objective of the deal might be less about comprehensive regional harmony and more about shifting geopolitical influence and forging new strategic alignments, even if it means alienating existing powers. The "peace" serves as a means to a larger strategic end, its conditional nature immediately evident in the fierce regional pushback it has provoked.
The roots of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh stretch back more than a century, predating the establishment of their independent national republics in 1918. The creation of Armenian autonomy within Soviet Azerbaijan between 1921 and 1991 effectively froze this deeply entrenched dispute, only for it to reignite with the unraveling of the Soviet Union. The First Nagorno-Karabakh War, spanning from 1988 to 1994, erupted as an ethnic and territorial conflict, marked by brutal ethnic cleansing campaigns against Karabakh Armenians and ethnic Armenians in Azerbaijani cities like Baku and Sumgait. Hundreds of thousands were forced to flee their homes on both sides, leaving no Armenian communities on the Azerbaijani-controlled side and no Azerbaijani communities on the Armenian side by 1990. This conflict resulted in an estimated 11,557 to 30,000 deaths and the displacement of approximately 724,000 Azerbaijanis and 300,000 to 500,000 Armenians. By 1993, Armenia had gained control of Nagorno-Karabakh and occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan's geographic area, leading to a de facto independent Nagorno-Karabakh. Throughout this period, Azerbaijan, ruled by the Aliyev family for nearly half a century, consistently demanded complete control over Nagorno-Karabakh. This stance amounted to a call for its total ethnic cleansing. For decades, Azerbaijan prohibited entry to ethnic Armenians, regardless of citizenship, and even charged its citizens who visited Armenia with treason, actively discouraging any peace-building efforts.
The subsequent decades were characterized by a "frozen conflict" and the persistent failure of international mediation efforts. The OSCE Minsk Group, formed in 1994 and co-chaired by Russia, France, and the United States, mediated peace talks for years but ultimately failed to secure a lasting peace treaty. Azerbaijan, bolstered by growing military might fueled by hydrocarbon exports to the West, consistently pursued maximum gains either through talks or, failing that, through war. This strategy became starkly apparent in the late 2010s with frequent small-scale attacks, escalating into the April 2016 Four-Day War. The Second Karabakh War in the Fall of 2020, jointly launched by Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Aliyev, saw Turkish air force and Syrian mercenary support, displacing over 30,000 Armenians and resulting in thousands of casualties on all sides. Documented reports of war crimes, including executions and beheadings, emerged. The November 10, 2020, ceasefire, brokered by Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia, introduced Russian forces to protect Armenian-populated parts of Karabakh and a narrow corridor to Armenia. However, Azerbaijan repeatedly violated this agreement, moving positions forward, capturing prisoners, and, critically, blocking the Lachin corridor for nearly ten months from December 2022. This blockade led to severe humanitarian consequences for Karabakh's 120,000 Armenian population, which former International Criminal Court prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo characterized as an act of genocide. Azerbaijan did not lift the blockade; instead, on September 19, 2023, its armed forces launched a one-day attack of unprecedented scale upon the starved population, leading to their mass exodus to Armenia and the ethnic cleansing of the region of Armenians for the first time in its millennia-old history. This series of events left Azerbaijan in an overwhelmingly dominant negotiating position, controlling pockets of Armenian territory and detaining Armenian prisoners, including former Artsakh presidents and high-ranking officials. The "peace deal" now on the table is not a resolution of underlying ethnic and territorial grievances but rather a formalization of the military realities established by Azerbaijan's recent victories. Armenia's weakened position, stemming directly from these military losses and the profound humanitarian crisis, made it more susceptible to a deal that might otherwise be seen as highly unfavorable. This historical trajectory underscores that past failures of mediation often manage symptoms rather than cure the disease of deep-seated ethnic and territorial disputes, allowing them to fester and re-erupt, ultimately shaping the current geopolitical landscape.
The core of the White House-brokered agreement centers on the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity," or TRIPP corridor. This landmark deal grants the United States "exclusive special development rights for 99 years" to construct this strategic transit route. The TRIPP's primary purpose is to connect mainland Azerbaijan with its exclave, Nakhchivan, via a 20-mile (32km) stretch of Armenian territory, specifically the Syunik or Zangezur region. This link is designed to create a continuous corridor from Azerbaijan directly to Turkey, enhancing regional connectivity in the South Caucasus and streamlining access to Europe and the West. Crucially, the route is stated to operate under Armenian law, a provision intended to balance Armenian and Azerbaijani demands. However, the deal notably contains no commitment from Armenia to amend its constitution. The United States will sublease the land to a consortium of private companies for infrastructure and management, with at least nine firms, including three US-based operators, already expressing interest in developing the railways, energy transport infrastructure, and fiber-optic lines. The White House has framed this agreement as a "strategic victory for Washington and its allies," emphasizing its potential to enable "unhindered connectivity" and bolster cooperation in energy, technology, and the economy. A significant aspect of this geopolitical re-alignment is that the route explicitly bypasses both Iran and Russia, signaling a clear intent to diminish their regional influence. As part of this sweeping agreement, Armenia and Azerbaijan also jointly requested the dissolution of the OSCE Minsk Group. This long-standing mediation body had been deemed powerless by some after its failure to prevent Azerbaijan's forceful takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023. The terms of the deal, particularly the 99-year U.S. control and the explicit framing of winners and losers, indicate that this is far more than a simple bilateral peace agreement. It is a deliberate and assertive move by the United States to establish a significant and long-lasting strategic foothold in a region traditionally dominated by Russia and bordering Iran.
The dissolution of the Minsk Group removes a multilateral framework that included Russia, further cementing a shift towards US-led mediation and influence. This proactive approach by the U.S. signals a new era of competition in the South Caucasus, moving beyond traditional conflict resolution to active strategic positioning.
Tehran's reaction to the TRIPP corridor has been one of profound alarm, viewing it as "incredibly damaging" to its national interests. Iran considers its sole land border with Armenia a "critical artery" for its North-South trade route to Europe. The TRIPP, by placing this border under a US-controlled transit route aligned with Azerbaijani and Turkish interests, is perceived as effectively "constraining Tehran's only friendly access point to the South Caucasus," a prospect Iran has long opposed. Ali Akbar Velayati, a top adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader, issued a stark warning, declaring that the corridor "will not become a passage owned by Trump, but rather a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries". He emphasized Iran's "right to defend our interests compellingly". He highlighted recent military exercises in northwest Iran as a demonstration of the Islamic Republic's readiness and determination to prevent any geopolitical changes. Iran's concerns extend to the fear that the deal could "cut off its access to the Black Sea as well as to Europe via Georgia", erode Armenian sovereignty, and is seen as a "direct threat to both its border security and regional influence". The specter of a "foreign military and commercial presence along its border" and potential NATO encroachment also fuels Tehran's apprehension.
Paradoxically, Iran's foreign ministry initially welcomed the peace agreement as "an important step toward lasting regional peace," but immediately coupled this with a strong warning against "any foreign intervention near its borders" that could "undermine the region's security and lasting stability". Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian acknowledged that the framework of preserving territorial integrity and connection to Europe was met. Still, he specifically voiced concern about the involvement of an American company in building the road. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, in an attempt to allay Iran's fears, insisted that the TRIPP has no military component and poses no threat to Iran, suggesting it could even become an opportunity for economic cooperation between Iran and the United States, and Russia and the United States. However, this bilateral peace deal, intended to resolve one conflict, immediately generates a new, potentially more dangerous, geopolitical flashpoint involving a third, powerful regional actor. Iran's reaction is not merely opposition but a declaration of intent to actively prevent the corridor's operation, framing it as an existential threat to its strategic interests and security. While analysts suggest Iran, currently under mounting U.S. pressure and dealing with the aftermath of recent regional conflicts, "lacks the military power to block the corridor" outright, Tehran could still increase military signaling near the Aras River, bolster bilateral relations with Armenia, and coordinate actions with Russia to counter U.S. and Turkish gains. This situation highlights that the "peace" is not universal but selective, favoring certain actors at the direct expense of others, and making the TRIPP corridor a new fault line that could escalate tensions rather than diffuse them.
Moscow's reaction to the US-brokered deal has been cautious but pointed, emphasizing that any reconciliation process "must be situated within the regional context" and stressing that Russia's trilateral agreements with Armenia and Azerbaijan "remain valid". This stance reflects Russia's attempt to maintain relevance despite being largely sidelined from a deal brokered by its geopolitical rival. Russia's influence in the South Caucasus has been visibly declining, a trend significantly exacerbated by its preoccupation with the ongoing war in Ukraine. The Kremlin's failure to prevent Azerbaijan's swift takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023 further eroded its long-standing role as Armenia's primary security guarantor, pushing Yerevan to question its traditional alliance and seek alternative partners. Recent strains in Russia-Azerbaijan relations, including incidents such as the detention of Azerbaijani citizens in Russia and Baku's closure of Russian media outlets, also underscore Moscow's diminishing sway. The TRIPP corridor directly challenges Russia's traditional influence, potentially undermining its hopes of deploying border troops along the route as per earlier agreements and impacting its economic interests, including the ambitious International North-South Transport Corridor. The conflict in Ukraine has created a power vacuum and diverted Russia's attention and resources, allowing other actors like the U.S. and Turkey to step into its traditional sphere of influence in the South Caucasus. This is a clear cause-and-effect relationship: Russia's global strategic commitments and failures elsewhere directly weaken its regional standing and enable new alignments. While Russia's "neutrality" on the TRIPP reflects a calculated balancing act, unwilling to risk confrontation with the U.S. or Turkey, it retains significant leverage through its military base in Gyumri, its control over the Armenia-Iran border, and deep economic ties with Armenia. Russia remains capable of disrupting the region, and the stability of the TRIPP corridor will remain intertwined with the trajectory of the Ukraine war and Russia's future geopolitical posture.
For Ankara, the TRIPP corridor represents a profound strategic success, solidifying Turkey's growing role as a regional hegemon and effectively replacing Russia in that capacity. The corridor provides Turkey with a vital physical connection to the Turkic world in the Caspian basin, reinforcing its position as a regional transit hub and deepening its geopolitical influence across the South Caucasus. This aligns perfectly with the broader "Middle Corridor" initiative, also known as the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), a crucial trade route designed to link China to Europe via Central Asia and the South Caucasus, strategically bypassing both Russia and Iran. Turkey views this as a historic opportunity to establish itself as a central strategic transit hub in the burgeoning Europe-China trade. Turkey's strategic support for Azerbaijan during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, which fundamentally shifted the balance of power in the region, laid the groundwork for this current ascendancy. Now, Turkey is poised to expand its economic and military footprint in the Caucasus, aligning closely with Azerbaijan to achieve these ambitions. The TRIPP corridor serves as a critical physical artery that facilitates Ankara's geopolitical projection, economic integration, and strategic influence, particularly in light of Russia's waning power. It is a clear illustration of how infrastructure projects are not merely about commerce but are potent tools for strategic re-alignment and the assertion of regional dominance. The TRIPP corridor, therefore, is a key enabler for Turkey's rising power in the South Caucasus, potentially leading to a new regional order where Ankara plays a more prominent role, challenging traditional Russian dominance and creating a new axis with Azerbaijan that has significant implications for trade, energy, and security across Eurasia.
Armenia's motivations for signing the TRIPP deal reflect a calculated gamble born out of a profoundly vulnerable position. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan hailed the agreement as a "significant milestone" and a crucial step towards "peace and a pivot to the West". He publicly credited President Trump's "personal engagement and resolute commitment to peace" for making the breakthrough possible. Armenia harbors hopes of normalizing relations with Turkey and gaining much-needed access to European and global markets, which could potentially lower trade costs and foster stronger ties with the West, given Turkey's NATO membership. This push towards the West comes at a time when Armenia finds itself in an increasingly precarious situation, having effectively "broken with Russia" and now lacking a strong regional ally. This vulnerability is a direct consequence of Russia's failure to protect Armenia during Azerbaijan's 2023 offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh and the ongoing Azerbaijani occupation of Armenian territory. The agreement, however, entails significant concessions for Armenia. Its role is "largely that of a transit corridor" with "limited control over the route" and "few opportunities to capture significant value" from passing commerce. Armenia thus concedes "a degree of strategic advantage to two rivals" in the region, Azerbaijan and Turkey. The acceptance of this deal is a strategic necessity born out of weakness and a lack of viable alternatives, rather than an equal partnership. The "peace" comes at a significant cost to its sovereignty and strategic advantage, with many contentious issues left unaddressed or deferred.
Internally, Pashinyan's government has faced sustained protests since 2024, with critics accusing him of "sacrificing Armenian interests for US and Azerbaijani influence". Concerns persist over long-term sovereignty due to the 99-year lease granted to the US-backed consortium. Furthermore, Azerbaijan continues to press its demand for Armenia to amend its constitution to eliminate "baseless territorial claims" against Azerbaijan, a significant sticking point that could fuel further unrest. Crucially, the agreement leaves several profound humanitarian issues unresolved. There is "no conclusion on the rights and security of ethnic Armenians to return to Nagorno-Karabakh" after the 2023 exodus, and Armenian captives and prisoners of war remain in Azerbaijani custody. The internal protests highlight the public perception of these concessions. The long-term stability of the deal from Armenia's perspective will depend on whether the promised benefits of Western integration and economic development genuinely outweigh the perceived loss of sovereignty and the unresolved humanitarian and territorial issues. It also raises questions about the very definition of "peace" when one party is compelled to accept terms under duress.
For Azerbaijan, the TRIPP agreement represents a profound strategic triumph and the culmination of long-standing objectives. President Ilham Aliyev hailed the agreement as a "miracle" and a "historic signature" that would "establish peace in the Caucasus". For Baku, the project "fulfills a long-standing strategic goal of securing a direct land link to its Nakhchivan exclave and, through it, to Türkiye". Azerbaijan entered these negotiations from a position of overwhelming strength, having "fully reclaimed the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh territory and displaced the region's Armenian population in 2023". Furthermore, it controls "pockets of territory inside Armenia itself," giving it significant leverage. Azerbaijan's military successes in 2020 and especially 2023 fundamentally altered the power dynamics, creating a highly advantageous position from which to negotiate. The peace deal, particularly the TRIPP corridor, appears to be a direct consequence and formalization of these military gains, allowing Azerbaijan to achieve strategic objectives that were previously unattainable through diplomacy alone. It is a peace dictated from a position of strength. The TRIPP corridor significantly enhances Azerbaijan's standing in regional commerce and strengthens its political alliance with Turkey, a key partner in its regional ambitions. Azerbaijan has already made substantial progress in developing its portion of the infrastructure, including modern highways and railway lines, underscoring its commitment to the project's realization. This suggests that military force remains a potent tool in shaping geopolitical outcomes, even in the context of "peace" negotiations. The deal consolidates Azerbaijan's territorial and strategic victories, potentially emboldening it to further press its demands, such as constitutional changes in Armenia, by leveraging the threat of non-compliance or further military action. The "peace" is less about reconciliation and more about the formal acceptance of a new status quo established by force.
Beyond its immediate political implications, the TRIPP corridor carries immense economic potential, projected to "unlock $50 billion to $100 billion in annual trade value by 2027" and positioning it as a "critical artery for Eurasian commerce". This new route is designed to integrate seamlessly into the broader "Middle Corridor," also known as the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), a pivotal trade route connecting China and Central Asia to Europe. Critically, the Middle Corridor, with the TRIPP as a key link, offers a direct alternative that bypasses traditional routes through Russia and Iran, which have faced disruptions due to geopolitical tensions and sanctions. This land-based logistics route is expected to reduce freight transit times between China and Europe by 10 to 15 days compared to traditional sea routes, making it an attractive option for high-value goods. The economic benefits and logistical efficiencies of the TRIPP are not merely commercial objectives; they are deeply strategic. By creating a new, Western-aligned trade and energy route, the U.S. is actively re-orienting Eurasian commerce away from Russian and Iranian influence, diminishing their economic leverage and increasing the West's. This is a deliberate effort to use infrastructure development as a tool for geopolitical realignment, creating economic interdependence that favors Western interests.
The energy transit implications of the TRIPP are equally significant. The corridor is integrated with the Southern Gas Corridor, holding the potential to supply up to 10 percent of Europe's gas needs by 2030. This would substantially enhance Europe's energy security by diversifying its energy supply and reducing its reliance on Russian imports. For Azerbaijan, the corridor promises a vital boost to its non-oil sector, a strategic priority for sustainable growth, with projected export volume increases of over $700 million and annual non-oil GDP growth of around 2 percent. While Armenia's role is primarily that of a transit country with limited control, the corridor still offers it potential access to global trade networks and opportunities to attract investment, fostering its integration into the regional economy. The project also presents lucrative investment opportunities for U.S. energy, logistics, and infrastructure firms, with nine consortia, including three U.S.-based operators, already expressing interest in developing the necessary infrastructure. The TRIPP corridor represents a long-term strategic play to reshape global supply chains and energy flows, with profound implications for the economic and political power of all regional and international actors. Its success would not only bring prosperity to some but also strategically isolate and weaken others, making it a central battleground in the ongoing "corridor wars."
The path ahead for the TRIPP corridor and the broader Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal is fraught with complex challenges and geopolitical rivalries. Despite the fanfare surrounding its signing, the agreement is not a panacea for regional stability. Iran's strategic opposition remains a formidable obstacle. Tehran's strong rhetoric, including threats of turning the corridor into a "graveyard for Trump's mercenaries," underscores its determination to prevent any perceived erosion of its border security and regional influence. While analysts suggest Iran may lack the military power to block the corridor outright, its capacity for disruption through military signaling near the Aras River, bolstering bilateral relations with Armenia, and coordinating actions with Russia should not be underestimated.
Internal political instability in Armenia also poses a significant hurdle. Prime Minister Pashinyan's government faces sustained public protests and accusations of sacrificing national interests. The demand for Armenia to amend its constitution to renounce historical claims to Nagorno-Karabakh remains a contentious issue, and any delays in constitutional reforms could stall infrastructure development. Concerns over long-term sovereignty, stemming from the 99-year lease granted to the US-backed consortium, further fuel public unrest.
Russia, despite its declining influence, retains the capacity to destabilize the region. Its military base in Gyumri, its control over the Armenia-Iran border, and its economic leverage provide Moscow with tools to exert pressure. While Russia's public stance has been one of cautious assessment, its strategic partnership with Iran and its geopolitical interests suggest it could collaborate to impede the corridor's progress. The explicit lack of "hard security guarantees" from the United States for the parties means the corridor's security will largely depend on commercial principles and the delicate balance of regional stability, rather than direct military protection.
Finally, the profound humanitarian issues stemming from the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict remain unresolved. There has been no conclusion on the rights and security of ethnic Armenians to return to Nagorno-Karabakh, nor on the release of Armenian prisoners of war still held in Azerbaijani custody. These lingering grievances could continue to fuel tensions, undermine the fragile peace, and serve as flashpoints for future conflict. The TRIPP deal, while a landmark achievement for U.S. and Western interests, creates new vulnerabilities and points of friction, potentially leading to a prolonged period of instability and indirect competition rather than a definitive resolution of regional tensions. The South Caucasus remains a volatile "geopolitical crossroads," where external powers vie for influence, and the long-term viability of this ambitious peace corridor will hinge on the complex interplay of these profound geopolitical rivalries, internal political complexities, and lingering humanitarian concerns. The "peace" is a precarious one, dependent on a delicate balance of power and the successful navigation of multiple, often conflicting, agendas.
References
Aliyev, Ilham. "Azerbaijan: Karabakh." President. az. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://president.az/en/pages/view/azerbaijan/karabakh.
"Armenia-Azerbaijan Agreement Delivers Strategic Win for Washington." The Soufan Center. August 11, 2025. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-august-11/.
"Armenia, Azerbaijan Sign US-Brokered Peace Deal, Agree to Open 'Trump Route' Transit Corridor." bne IntelliNews. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.intellinews.com/turkish-reactions-to-us-brokered-azerbaijan-armenia-peace-deal-split-between-strong-support-and-deep-suspicion-395468/?source=armenia.
"Armenia Has a Secure and Stable Border, Which Plays a Vital Role in Strengthening Regional Security: Iranian Ambassador to Armenia." Armenpress. July 19, 2024. https://armenpress.am/en/article/1196046.
"Assessing Strategic and Economic Risks of Trump-Brokered Caucasus Corridor for Global Investors." Ainvest. August 25, 2025. https://www.ainvest.com/news/assessing-strategic-economic-risks-trump-brokered-caucasus-corridor-global-investors-2508/.
"Azerbaijan and Armenia Sign Peace Deal at White House That Creates a 'Trump Route' in Region." The Guardian. August 9, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/09/azerbaijan-and-armenia-sign-peace-deal-at-white-house-that-creates-a-trump-route-in-region.
"Azerbaijan-Armenia Peace Deal: Khamenei Aide Says Iran Will Oppose Peace Corridor Near Its Border, Warns It May Turn a Graveyard for Trump's Mercenaries." Times of India. August 9, 2025. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/armenia-azerbaijan-deal-khamenei-aide-says-iran-will-oppose-peace-corridor-near-its-border-warns-it-may-turn-a-graveyard-for-trumps-mercenaries/articleshow/123207012.cms.
"Baku Launched a Full-Scale Offensive Campaign Against the 10-Month Blockaded Karabakh." USC Dornsife. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://dornsife.usc.edu/armenian/initiatives/resources-on-karabakh/chronology-of-events/.
"Changing Geopolitics of the South Caucasus After the Second Karabakh War." CMI. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.cmi.no/publications/8911-changing-geopolitics-of-the-south-caucasus-after-the-second-karabakh-war.
"Donald Trump Has Brokered a Deal That Could Reshape the South Caucasus." TVP World. YouTube video, 1:44. August 8, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVd3NiCIvAw.
"EU's Eastern Partnership Policy." European Parliament. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/172/three-eastern-partnership-neighbours-in-the-south-caucasus.
"First Nagorno-Karabakh War." Wikipedia. Last modified August 11, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Nagorno-Karabakh_War.
Giannopoulos, Costas. "Greek Analyst Hails TRIPP Corridor as Game-Changer for Caucasus Geopolitics." Caliber.az. August 11, 2025. https://caliber.az/en/post/greek-analyst-hails-tripp-corridor-as-game-changer-for-caucasus-geopolitics.
"Iran and Russia Stand to Lose from US Deal with Azerbaijan and Armenia." The Guardian. August 9, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/09/iran-and-russia-stand-to-lose-from-us-deal-with-azerbaijan-and-armenia.
"Iran Threatens Donald Trump Armenia-Azerbaijan Deal." Newsweek. August 10, 2025. https://www.newsweek.com/iran-threatens-donald-trump-armenia-azerbaijan-deal-2111615.
"Iran Threatens Planned Trump Corridor Envisaged by Azerbaijan-Armenia Peace Deal." The Times of Israel. August 9, 2025. https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-threatens-planned-trump-corridor-envisaged-by-azerbaijan-armenia-peace-deal/.
"Iran Threatens Trump-Backed Transit Corridor." The Daily Star. August 9, 2025. https://www.thedailystar.net/news/world/news/iran-threatens-trump-backed-transit-corridor-3959886.
"Iranian President's Statement on TRIPP Corridor." Azatutyun.am. August 11, 2025. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/33499756.html.
"Middle Corridor: A Renaissance in Global Commerce." RAND Corporation. March 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2024/03/the-middle-corridor-a-renaissance-in-global-commerce.
"Navigating Troubled Waters: Impact of Global Trade Disruption on Shipping Routes in the Red Sea and Black Sea." UNCTAD. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://unctad.org/publication/navigating-troubled-waters-impact-global-trade-disruption-shipping-routes-red-sea-black.
"Peace in the Caucasuses: Armenia, Azerbaijan Back Donald Trump for Nobel Prize." Times of India. August 9, 2025. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/peace-in-the-caucasuses-armenia-azerbaijan-back-donald-trump-for-nobel-prize-full-list-of-countries-backing-us-president/articleshow/123199806.cms.
"President Trump Brokers Another Historic Peace Deal." The White House. August 8, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/08/president-trump-brokers-another-historic-peace-deal/.
"Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's Statement at the Trilateral Meeting with Donald Trump and Ilham Aliyev." Prime Minister of Armenia. August 9, 2025. https://www.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2025/08/09/Nikol-Pashinyan-US-trilateral-meeting/.
"Russia Claims Trilateral Agreements With Armenia, Azerbaijan 'Still Valid'." Azatutyun.am. August 11, 2025. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/33499730.html.
"Russia's Grip Weakens In The South Caucasus, Opening Doors To New Players." RFE/RL. July 2, 2024. https://www.rferl.org/a/south-caucasus-russia-losing-influence-armenia-azerbaijan/33475018.html.
"South Caucasus Set for Geopolitical Re-alignment." Commonspace.eu. August 8, 2025. https://www.commonspace.eu/opinion/south-caucasus-set-geopolitical-realignment.
"The Caucasus Contains a Set of Protracted Conflicts." SIPRI. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.sipri.org/research/conflict-peace-and-security/russia-and-eurasia/conflict-and-peacebuilding-caucasus.
"The Middle Corridor: A Strategic Alternative." Atlantic Council. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/ac-turkey-defense-journal/why-the-middle-corridor-matters-amid-a-geopolitical-resorting/.
"The Proposed Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP)." Al Arabiya English. August 9, 2025. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2025/08/09/iran-will-block-trumpbrokered-corridor-in-caucasus-adviser-to-iranian-leader-says.
"The Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP)." The Soufan Center. August 11, 2025. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-august-11/.
"Trump Celebrates 'Peace Deal' With Azerbaijan and Armenia That Gives U.S. Access to Key Transit Route." Time. August 9, 2025. https://time.com/7308564/trump-peace-deal-armenia-azerbaijan/.
"Trump Gains Control of Zangezur Corridor After Brokering Azerbaijan-Armenia Peace Deal." The Cradle. August 9, 2025. https://thecradle.co/articles/Trump-gains-control-of-Zangezur-corridor-after-brokering-azerbaijan-armenia-peace-deal.
"Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP)." Azernews.az. August 12, 2025. https://www.azernews.az/analysis/245884.html.
"Trump's Caucasus Corridor and the Reshaping of Eurasian Trade." Ainvest. August 25, 2025. https://www.ainvest.com/news/trump-caucasus-corridor-reshaping-eurasian-trade-routes-strategic-investment-geopolitical-realignment-2508/.
"Trump's Caucasus Corridor: Reshaping Eurasian Trade Routes." Ainvest. August 25, 2025. https://www.ainvest.com/news/trump-caucasus-corridor-reshaping-eurasian-trade-routes-strategic-investment-geopolitical-realignment-2508/.
"Turkish Reactions to US-Brokered Azerbaijan-Armenia Peace Deal." bne IntelliNews. August 9, 2025. https://www.intellinews.com/turkish-reactions-to-us-brokered-azerbaijan-armenia-peace-deal-split-between-strong-support-and-deep-suspicion-395468/?source=armenia.
"Understanding the Conflict." USC Dornsife. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://dornsife.usc.edu/armenian/initiatives/resources-on-karabakh/understanding-the-conflict/.
"US-Brokered Agreement Alters the Power Dynamic in the South Caucasus." SpecialEurasia. August 9, 2025. https://www.specialeurasia.com/2025/08/09/us-armenia-azerbaijan-peace-deal/.
"US President Did a Miracle: Armenia and Azerbaijan Sign Peace Treaty at White House Summit, Announce Trump Route Transit Corridor." Times of India. August 9, 2025. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/us-president-did-a-miracle-armenia-and-azerbaijan-sign-peace-treaty-at-white-house-summit-announce-trump-route-transit-corridor/articleshow/123196940.cms.
"US Presence in Caucasus Aimed at Isolating Russia." Mehr News Agency. August 12, 2025. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/235317/US-presence-in-Caucasus-aimed-at-isolating-Russia.
"Why US, Not Russia, Made Peace in Former Soviet South Caucasus." Lowy Institute. August 9, 2025. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/why-us-not-russia-made-peace-former-soviet-south-caucasus.
"Why the Middle Corridor Matters Amid a Geopolitical Resorting." Atlantic Council. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/ac-turkey-defense-journal/why-the-middle-corridor-matters-amid-a-geopolitical-resorting/.
"Zangezur Corridor." Wikipedia. Last modified August 11, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zangezur_corridor.
"Zangezur Corridor: Geopolitical Crossroads, Investment Frontier South Caucasus." Ainvest. August 25, 2025. https://www.ainvest.com/news/zangezur-corridor-geopolitical-crossroads-investment-frontier-south-caucasus-2508/.
"Zangezur Corridor: A Key Trade Link in the South Caucasus." Geopolitical Monitor. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-zangezur-corridor-a-key-trade-link-in-the-south-caucasus/.
"Zangazur (TRIPP) Corridor: Bold Step Toward Connectivity in Caucasus." Azernews.az. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.azernews.az/analysis/240871.html.
Add comment
Comments